Podcasting and input and output-based language learning of English modal verbs

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of English Language, Sarab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sarab, Iran.

2 Department of English Language, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran.

3 Department of English Language, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of podcasts in teaching EFL learners English modal verbs (EMVs). It argues that current deductive exercises are ineffective and proposes a more engaging alternative through podcasts. A quasi-experimental design with pre-test, post-test, and control group was employed. The Oxford Quick Placement Test ensured homogeneity among 193 initial EFL students at Islamic Azad University in Rasht, with 157 participants selected and randomly assigned to five experimental groups (n=26) and one control group (n=27). The experimental groups received training on EMVs via six podcast episodes, incorporating input-based (e.g., comprehension tasks) or output-based (e.g., speaking tasks) exercises. In contrast, the control group used traditional paper-and-pencil drills. All groups took pre-tests and post-tests on EMVs, with item order varied to mitigate practice effects. Results were analyzed for statistical significance, revealing a significant and promising improvement in EFL learners’ EMV knowledge. The podcasts naturally integrated EMVs into the conversation rather than explicitly explaining grammar rules, making the learning process more engaging. Findings suggest practical applications for teachers designing podcast-based exercises to maximize language acquisition. The findings are discussed in light of current perspectives on language learning and development, and suggestions for future research are provided.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Abdous, M. H., Camarena, M. M., & Facer, B. R. (2009). MALL technology: Use of academic podcasting in the foreign language classroom. ReCALL, 21(1), 76-95.
Abdulrahman, T., Basalama, N., & Widodo, M. R. (2018). The Impact of Podcasts on EFL Students’ Listening Comprehension. International Journal of Language Education, 2(2), 23-33.
Adams-Chapman, I. (2006). Neurodevelopmental outcome of the late preterm infant. Clinics in perinatology, 33(4), 947–964.
Al-Jarf, R. (2023). Grammar Podcasts for ESL College Students. Online Submission, 2(2), 36–43.
Andersen, R. H., & Dau, S. (2020, October). The Potential of Podcasts as a Learning Medium in Higher Education. In European Conference on e-Learning (Vol. 2020, pp. 16–22). Academic Conferences and Publishing International.
Asoodar, M., Marandi, S. S., Vaezi, S., & Desmet, P. (2016). Podcasting in a virtual English for academic purposes course: Learner motivation. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(4), 875-896.
Asyifah, D. A., & Indriani, L. (2021). The student perspective: The impact of podcasts on EFL students listening comprehension. Eduvelop: Journal of English Education and Development, 4(2), 127-134.
Bahrani, T., & Nekoueizadeh, M. (2014). The role of input in second language acquisition. Journal of Advances in Linguistics, 1(1), 1-6.
Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and language development (pp. 279–362). NewYork: Wiley.
Bueno-Alastuey, M. C., & Nemeth, K. (2022). Quizlet and podcasts: effects on vocabulary acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1407-1436.
Cann, A. J. (2007). Podcasting is dead. Long live video! Bioscience Education, 10(1), 1–4.
Chaikovska, O. (2020). The impact of podcasts designed through audacity on improving grammar skills. Open educational e-environment of modern university, 8, 1-7.
Chaves-Yuste, B., & de-la Peña, C. (2023). Podcasts’ effects on the EFL classroom: a socially relevant intervention. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 20.
Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (Eds.). (2008). The handbook of second language acquisition. John Wiley & Sons.
Drew, C. (2017). Edutaining audio: an exploration of education podcast design possibilities. Educational Media International, 54(1), 48-62.
Elekaei, A., Tabrizi, H. H., & Chalak, A. (2020). Evaluating learners’ vocabulary gain and retention in an e-learning context using vocabulary podcasting tasks: a case study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(2), 190-203.
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2014). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 194-220). Routledge.
Guo, Q. (2022). Interlanguage and Its Implications to Second Language Teaching and Learning. Pacific International Journal, 5(4), 08-14.
Harley, B. (1989). Functional grammar in French immersion: A classroom experiment. Applied Linguistics, 10, 331-359.
Harrington, M. (2004). Commentary: Input Processing as a Theory of Processing Input. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and Commentary. (pp. 81-94). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Harris, H., & Park, S. (2008). Educational usages of podcasting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 548.
Hasan, M. M., & Hoon, T. B. (2013). Podcast applications in language learning: A review of recent studies. English language teaching, 6(2), 128-135.
Heilesen, S. B. (2010). What is the academic efficacy of podcasting?. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1063-1068.
Ibrahim, A. (2022). The Positive Impact of Using Podcasts in Education in El Baha University College of Science and Arts Elmikhwa Branch. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 7(4), 324-328.
Iranmanesh, H., & Motallebikia, S. M. (2015). Teaching Modal Verbs: Task-based vs. traditional approaches. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 3(11), 39-46.
Kawaguchi, S. (2021). Second Language Acquisition and Digital Learning in Asia. Asiatic: IIUM Journal of English Language and Literature, 15(1), 36-52.
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications.
Kreidler, C. (1999). Introducing English Semantics. Routledge
 
Leech, G. (2004). Meaning and the English verb. Longman.
Mashhadi, A., Hayati, M., & Jalilifar, A. (2016). The Impact of Podcasts on English Vocabulary Development in a Blended Educational Model. Applied Research on English Language, 5(2), 145-172.
McBride, K. (2009). Podcasts and second language learning. Electronic Discourse in Language Learning and Language teaching, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 153-167.
Moss, N. D., O’Connor, E. L., & White, K. M. (2010). Psychosocial predictors of the use of enhanced podcasting in student learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 302-309.
Nagata, N. (1998). Input vs. output practice in educational software for second language acquisition, Language Learning & Technology, 1(2), 23-40.
Nam, E. (1975). Child and adult perceptual strategies in second language acquisition. Paper presented at the 1975 TESOL Convention, Los Angeles.
Nason, P. (2005). Is Podcasting the New Radio?. Washington Times, 7.
Rassaei, E. (2012). The effects of input-based and output-based instruction on L2 development. Tesl-Ej, 16(3), n3.
Razaghi, A., Faruji, L. F., & Salehi, M. (2022). Audio Podcast Retelling versus Corpus-Based Learning and Vocabulary Knowledge Development of English Language Learners. Anatolian Journal of Education, 7(1), 181-196.
Samad, I. A., Bustari, A., & Ahmad, D. (2017). The use of podcasts in improving students’ speaking skill. Journal of English Language and Education, 3(2), 97-111.
Scutter, S., Stupans, I., Sawyer, T., & King, S. (2010). How do students use podcasts to support learning? Australasian journal of educational technology, 26(2).
Saeedakhtar, A., Haqju, R., & Rouhi, A. (2021). The impact of collaborative listening to podcasts on high school learners’ listening comprehension and vocabulary learning. System, 101, 102588.
Selingo, J. (2006). Students and teachers, from K to 12, hit the podcasts. New York Times, G4.
Stanley, G. (2006). Podcasting: Audio on the Internet Comes of Age. T E S L -E J , 9(4), 1-7. Retrieved from https://tesl-ej.org/ej36/int.pdf
Suseno, E. (2024). Using Podcast Material to Modify Foreign Words and Expressions to Improve EFL Learners’ Speaking Abilities. Linguistics Initiative, 4(1), 16-29.
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In C. Ferguson & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Studies in child language development (pp. 175-208). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook and B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125-144). Oxford University Press.
Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 6, pp. 497-516). Boston, MA: pearson.
VanPatten, B. (1984). Learners’ comprehension of clitic pronouns: More evidence for a word order strategy. Hispanic Linguistics, 1, 57-67.
VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52, 755-803.
VanPatten, B. (2003). From input to output: A teacher’s guide to second language acquisition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Yanmin, W., & Yi, P. (2019). A Review of the Application and Development of Output Hypothesis Theory in Foreign Language Teaching. IRA International Journal of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies, 15(3), 88.
Zhang, S. (2009). The Role of Input, Interaction and Output in the Development of Oral Fluency. English language teaching, 2(4), 91-100.
Zauche, L. H., Thul, T. A., Mahoney, A. E. D., & Stapel-Wax, J. L. (2016). Influence of language nutrition on children’s language and cognitive development: An integrated review. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 318-333.
Zydney, J. M., Warner, Z., & Angelone, L. (2020). Learning through experience: Using design based research to redesign protocols for blended synchronous learning environments. Computers & Education, 143, 103678
Technology Assisted Language Education
Volume 2, Issue 1
March 2024
Pages 84-108

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics